No Designation

The Politics of Identity on the Edge

Definitions

Here are a few definitions that might be particularly useful for folks new to some of these issues. Even if you know this stuff, there are a few concepts I talk about that really haven’t had terms for them in general use or terms that vary in how their used.

Gender Terms

  • Transgender or Trans – Traditionally defined as a person who doesn’t identify with the gender they were assigned at birth, I prefer to shift the focus away from assigned gender and define transgender as a person who’s gender is not universally considered valid. That means that someone, somewhere, will tell a transperson that they are not the gender they say they are. (ex: a transman is someone who identifies as a man and that there would be someone out there who would tell him that he isn’t a man)
  • Cisgender/Cissexual – “Trans” is a prefix that means “the other side of” in Latin. “Cis-” means “the same side of”. So a cisgender person is someone who is not transgender, i.e. a person who’s gender is considered universally valid. (ex: a ciswoman is a someone who identifies as a woman and no one would think to contradict her). A distinction is sometimes made for the term cissexual, which emphasizes that someone is not dealing with the medical and legal aspects of a gender transition. In this case, someone who has a non-binary gender and not dealing with the medical and legal aspects of a gender transition might call themselves a cissexual genderqueer.
  • Non-Binary Gender – Binary gender is gender within a male/female binary limitation. When people discuss non-binary gender they are talking about gender identifications that do not fit within or cannot be represented by male/female gender. Plenty of transpeople conform to binary gender and are happy to do so, and conversely, there are plenty of cissexuals who reject binary gender.
  • Genderqueer – Often used as a catch-all for people who do not wholly fit into a gender binary. This can include people present or identify as a binary gender but otherwise see ways in which their gender doesn’t fit into a male/female binary. That may be described as being a (wo)man plus something else, or not quite being (wo)man, or bi-gender, or non-gender, or just none of the above.
  • Transfeminine – A person who’s femininity or female identity is not universally considered valid. Often used to talk about a wider range of how a person might identify their gender and would cover a spectrum of transwomen, as well as genderqueers, and people with non-binary genders who’s femininity or female-ness is being denied.
  • Transmasculine – A person who’s masculinity or male identity is not universally considered valid.
    Often used to talk about a wider range of how a person might identify their gender and would cover a spectrum of transmen, as well as genderqueers, and people with non-binary genders who’s masculinity or male-ness is being denied.
  • Transphobia – Describes the fear or hatred of transpeople leading to discrimination, oppression, and devaluing of transpeople in systematic, institutional, and individual ways.
  • Misogyny – Describes the fear or hatred of women leading to the discrimination, oppression, and devaluing of women in systematic, institutional, and individual ways.
  • Trans-Misogyny – The unique intersection of transphobia and misogyny that transfeminine spectrum people encounter. Includes transphobia that is applied to transwomen and not transmen as well as misogyny that is applied to transwomen and not ciswomen

Terms to describe Sexuality

  • Queer – Often used as a catch all to describe people who’s sexual practices are not heteronormative. Many people will specifically identify as queer and not as gay, lesbian, or bisexual due to the binary gender restrictions those terms have. Some people will say that a person who is straight but has non-heteronormative sexual practices is queer. This is debated, but usually I agree.
  • Culturally Queer Erotically Straight – A phrase used to describe one’s cultural connection and association with queer community as well as a straight sexual orientation. Used predominantly by straight queerspawn who grew up in queer environments and consider queer culture to be a part of their heritage.
  • Pansexual - Someone who is attracted to people of all genders. Pansexual is used as an alternative to bisexual with restricts gender to a binary. It is sometimes truncated and added as a prefix to other terms, such as Pandyke. Another meaning of pansexual is to describe an event that is open to people of all genders and sexual orientations.

Terms to describe Family

  • Queerspawn – People with LGBTQ parent(s), i.e. the spawn of queers. Sometimes transpawn and polyspawn are used to specify the identities a person’s parent(s) have.
  • Polyamory – ‘Poly’ means many and ‘amory’ means love. Polyamory is the practice of consensual non-monogamy and includes a wide variety of family structures.

Terms to describe Oppression and Power Dynamics

  • Postmodernism – A critical questioing of the notion that there is one valid perspective, i.e. what is ‘real.’ Postmodernism asserts that multipleperspectives can be real and valid at the same time. When a person holds a perspective as a part of their lived experience, it becomes real to their experience and can be just as valid as the perspective of others, even if that person’s perspective is not supported by the mainstream.
  • Exoticism – Seeing a person as special, beautiful, or intriguing due to their status as ‘other.’ This process can be rather dehumanizing and emphasizes a person’s status as a novelty or object for the intrigue of others. This can bring on a feeling of being a specimen in a zoo.
  • Ableism – The systematic oppression and devaluing of people based on dis/abilities.
  • Fat-Phobia - The systematic oppression and devaluing of people based on weight, body size, and fatness.

This is always a work in progress. Sometimes I can know exactly what I want to describe but not be able to come up with the right explanation for it. Think something is missing or needs to be re-worked? Let me know.

4 Comments »

  1. [...] for “trans” that works for me. you can find it on the blog no designation on their definition page. it reads: Transgender or Trans – Traditionally defined as a person who doesn’t identify with the [...]

    Pingback by » trans defined | June 27, 2007 | Reply

  2. Thanks a lot for this page. It helps me understand a lot of new concepts.

    Comment by clare c | October 28, 2007 | Reply

  3. I was pointed here from “Alas”, where I was discussing why I felt that “transgender” had become a sort of pointless / meaningless / offensive word. I see that your definition of “transgender” makes the mistakes that I was discussing.

    I provided two examples in my discussion — “Bob”, a heterosexual male-to-female cross-dresser who is very clear in his mind that he is a man. “Jo”, a stone butch woman who frequently passes for male, without even trying. She is very clear that she is a woman.

    In that discussion with both seem to agree that “Bob” and “Jo” are both transgender individuals. And given the self-identification that I’ve presented, we’d have to agree that “Bob” is a transgender man, and “Jo” is a “transgender woman”. If you disagree, please explain.

    See the problem here? Bob says he is a man, who is going to disagree with him or invalidate his gender? Jo says she is a woman. People might complain that she is “mannish”, but who is going to say she isn’t actually a woman?

    Comment by FurryCatHerder | June 20, 2009 | Reply

  4. I looked but can’t find the discussion on “Alas,” that you reference. But let me give you my perspective on the examples you provide. I think you’re getting into a more advanced dilineation than this definition sheet was created for. First we have to acknowledge that there are multiple interpretations of trans that are simultaneously being used by different and sometimes the same people.

    In some cases, it’s a broad umbrella term that includes a wide variety of folks who’s genders are questioned (thus my definition above), such as crossdressers, butch women, transsexuals, etc. While most folks define it as such, you might find more usage which focuses specifically on those who identify and present as a gender other than what they were assigned at birth, often but not always with the aid of hormones, legal documentation change, etc.

    So we have a category of people who are often included in definitions of transgender and often excluded from discusions of transgender folks. It’s awkward, I don’t advocate it.

    This new take on defining the term is an experiment to try to draw a new line. If there’s anyone out there who might doubt someone’s gender, then they could see themselves as trans. “Jo” certainly fits that, as you say that she frequently passes for male, there are lots of people who see her as not a woman. “Bob” might only be at risk if people discover he’s crossdressing, but I’ve definitely seen folks who would say he’s “not a real man” because of it — not to mention folks who assume he’s on the first step toward transitioning. But just because someone can call themselves transgender doesn’t mean they have to. That’s where self-definiion comes in. And if there’s literally only one person in the world who invalidates a person’s gender, they might decide that the term transgender communicates more misinformation that information about themselves.

    As for Bob being a “transgender man” and Jo a “transgender woman”, I disagree, but only but only becuase those terms have taken on more of a meaning than the words mean individaully. Bob may be “transgender” and may be a “man”, but if he calls himself a “transgender man” then most folks are going to assume that he was assigned female at birth, which your example implies is not the case. So while he could fit the definition and press the issue if he wanted, our current usage of terminology is not as flexible. (Note that the information in the definitions about “trans men” and “cis woman” are given as examples, not as definitions, so they shouldn’t be taken as applicable in all cases).

    In any such case, reality perpetually defies definition and strives to move beyond any constraints we try to place on it using logic. I think no matter what definitions are used, there will always be folks who fall outside of it — again why I rely on self-definition.

    Comment by nodesignation | June 23, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment